Another case so soon? Surprisingly yes.
Discovery date and time: Saturday 10th May 2014, approximately 8:30am.
Same day, approximately 9:30am, approx. 1.5m away from first crime scene.
Same day, approximately 9:30am, approx. 2.5m away from first crime scene.
Description of victim: Large portions of skin found, no body.
Forensic report:
Cause of death: Note: This may not be a death, it may be a missing persons case. Given that skin flakes were found at three different areas, the victim may have been dragged when abducted (or killed). The skin may also be from three different victims (DNA testing to ascertain).
Estimated time ofdeath crime: Based on the freshness of the skin found, and presence of scavengers, estimated to be between 7am and 8:30am of Saturday 10th May.
Victim identification: Suspected to be a member (or members) of the Pheah family, as they are known for having skin that easily flakes. However, given that the Pheah family is known for giving birth to numerous identical twins at a time, it is impossible to ascertain which particular member of the family.
Additional info: DNA testing reveals all skin flakes found to be from a member of the Gou Hong Pheah family. The problem of identical twins still exists for this family, so it is impossible to know whether the skin is from one or multiple victims.
Attached: File photo of some members of the Gou Hong Pheah family
Investigative report:
Witnesses: None.
Suspect(s): All evidence points to the victim(s) having been abducted for food. All traces of the victim(s) were found in an area restricted to a small number of persons with high stomach capacity (high enough to warrant kidnapping a mmeber of the Pheah family when hungry). Exact number on the morning of 10th May: Two. This points to one of them being the culprit. The discoverer, WP can be eliminated as a suspect because evidence is easy to dispose of; no point reporting the case since it would only heighten security. The remaining suspect is WW.
Further action: No evidence to convict. Will keep an eye out for further action by the suspect.
Status: Filed as solved with no evidence.
Discovery date and time: Saturday 10th May 2014, approximately 8:30am.
| Note that scavengers have already arrived at the piece on the left. |
Same day, approximately 9:30am, approx. 1.5m away from first crime scene.
Same day, approximately 9:30am, approx. 2.5m away from first crime scene.
![]() |
| Note a tiny piece of skin almost the same colour as the floor. It has been circled to draw attention to it. |
Description of victim: Large portions of skin found, no body.
Forensic report:
Cause of death: Note: This may not be a death, it may be a missing persons case. Given that skin flakes were found at three different areas, the victim may have been dragged when abducted (or killed). The skin may also be from three different victims (DNA testing to ascertain).
Estimated time of
Victim identification: Suspected to be a member (or members) of the Pheah family, as they are known for having skin that easily flakes. However, given that the Pheah family is known for giving birth to numerous identical twins at a time, it is impossible to ascertain which particular member of the family.
Additional info: DNA testing reveals all skin flakes found to be from a member of the Gou Hong Pheah family. The problem of identical twins still exists for this family, so it is impossible to know whether the skin is from one or multiple victims.
Attached: File photo of some members of the Gou Hong Pheah family
Investigative report:
Witnesses: None.
Suspect(s): All evidence points to the victim(s) having been abducted for food. All traces of the victim(s) were found in an area restricted to a small number of persons with high stomach capacity (high enough to warrant kidnapping a mmeber of the Pheah family when hungry). Exact number on the morning of 10th May: Two. This points to one of them being the culprit. The discoverer, WP can be eliminated as a suspect because evidence is easy to dispose of; no point reporting the case since it would only heighten security. The remaining suspect is WW.
Further action: No evidence to convict. Will keep an eye out for further action by the suspect.
Status: Filed as solved with no evidence.




No comments:
Post a Comment